New Yorkers Debate Whether to Drill for Natural Gas in City’s Watershed
“Drill, baby, drill,” was the refrain at the Republican National Convention last week, but at a New York City Council hearing on drilling for natural gas in the city’s watershed, the loudest voices opposed drilling.
In recent months, environmentalists have voiced fears that New York state would open up the city’s watersheds for natural gas drilling. The watersheds are reservoirs in the Catskills that provide unfiltered drinking water for all of New York City. Concerned residents packed the council hearing today to sound off on their fears that the water supply would be contaminated, while the natural gas industry testified that there would be no damage.
Drilling in the city’s watershed is “just not feasible,” said James Gennaro, chair of the council’s Committee on Environmental Protection. “It is completely inconsistent with a drinking water supply.”
Most of the council members had left by the middle of the meeting, leaving Gennaro to grill representatives from the Energy API, the U.S. Oil and Gas Association and the Independent Petroleum Association of America.
They said that “development of natural gas resources in the Marcellus Shale will not pose any significant risk to the drinking water supplies of New York City.”
Then Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Grannis suggested that concerns over drilling in the waterways were premature.
“DEC has not received any applications for drilling in New York City’s watershed,” said Grannis. “None.”
He said DEC had received a “handful” of permit applications to drill elsewhere in the Marcellus Shale-Catskill watershed. NYC’s watershed is a portion of the larger Marcellus Shale watershed.
However, some lawmakers and activist groups said that preemptive action may be necessary. Assemblyman James Brennan, (D) 44th district, has introduced a bill that would temporarily ban drilling in watersheds throughout the state. The bill would also permanently ban drilling in the NYC watershed. State Senator Frank Padavan, of the 11th district, has said he will sponsor the bill when it reaches the state senate.
Assemblyman Brennan said that his bill had so far faced no opposition.
Carol Lawson, a lifelong Queens resident, said she came to City Hall because she is concerned that toxic chemicals would be introduced into the water supply.
“I am here because I am concerned about the effects of toxic chemicals on developing children,” said Lawson, an early intervention and child development specialist. She said she feared that chemicals that could lead to birth defects and learning disabilities might be introduced into the water that would lead to birth defects and learning disabilities.
Author’s note: For the sake of clarity, this entry was postdated to reflect the day it was written, not published.