Murder and Fried Chicken
Disclaimer: I feel sort of conflicted about posting this article. On one hand, it’s my cops, courts, crimes story, due today. I’m one blog short of my 13 required for Interactive. On the other hand, I worked hard on it and it’s a hilarious story. So if you can dig that, read on…
The fate of three men arrested and charged with the 2007 murder of rookie cop, Russell Timoshenko, may rest on a chicken bone. Four chicken bones, that is. Four chicken bones, some partially eaten pieces of Popeyes chicken, a biscuit, three beverages and the precise arrangement in which these items fell, when an early morning traffic stop turned deadly.
Three attorneys, each defending his own client, have not argued that their clients were elsewhere when bullets struck officer Timoshenko and his fellow rookie partner, Herman Yan who survived his wounds. They have not argued that their clients were not in the stolen BMW X5 that was abandoned following the shooting. They are not questioning whether a shooting took place, or whether the shooting that they agree did take place after their clients were pulled over in the early hours of July 9, resulted in the death of a New York City police officer. Instead, responding to evidence and testimony that connect each car seat with a very different role in the shooting, (the driver not shooting at all) they are battling the prosecution and each other for the least guilty seat in the car.
