Blogs at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism

Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’

The Unreasonably Popular Black Nerd Conversation

December 22nd, 2008 by Carla Murphy

John McWhorter sums up my position succinctly: “Calling attention to the fact that black nerds are often teased by black peers for “acting white” elicits predictable reactions, such as claims that the problem doesn’t exist.”

Yeah, the problem doesn’t exist.  Just by virtue of the fact that black people are inherently cool.  If there are nerds among us, they are anomalies, probably infected at birth by the same gene that makes white people smart, yet incredibly uncool.

Tongue in cheek, people.  Stay with me.

I’ve been listening to the unelected Black Nerd spokesman, McWhorter (and sometimes, Stanley Crouch), bitch about this “black nerds slammed for actin white” problem for what seems like a decade.  I didn’t even know that group needed representation.  I picture a whiny coven of old men plotting revenge over the ass whoopin’s and ego bruising they received as children.  Yeah.  Children are cruel (ever read Lord of the Flies?).  Get over it.  Stop turning your humiliation into a book, just because you have the nerd cred, i.e. degrees and media access, with which to do so.

Now that Barack Obama’s on the scene, McWhorter says black nerdiness is “in”–as if it were ever “out.”  If you grew up in a black neighborhood, “black” and “nerd” go together like no-name kicks, high water pants and coke bottle glasses. Like the cute girl with the pigtails who stayed behind after class to talk to the teacher.  Like the kid who the principal always singled out for good behavior.  Like every freshman class at Morehouse.  Like the kids who lived in fear of the 3pm bell.  And yes, like the kid who got jawned on for “actin’ white.”

Point is: this was a problem for a very specific group of black nerds.  So it is intriguing that McWhorter can push the angle that because black nerds were smart, they got jawned on for actin’ white and then get media play like it somehow indicates a problem for black America.  I mean, really?

I have another angle on McWhorter’s thesis. I came up in the prep school system and I distinctly remember thinking, about some of my peers, “I know we attend white schools but do you have to sound white, too?”

I never thought this about the few black kids who grew up on the UES or in the Village; I thought this about the kids who, like me, took trains, planes and automobiles home to working or middle class black neighborhoods but still managed to sound like the subculture who summered in East Hampton. I mean, really?

And sometimes, they pulled rank.  I remember one private school senior speaking down about her Bronx family members in front of a small assembly of tony Manhattanites and me. Her facial expression, tone of voice–both implied, with some show of shocked disgust, that her cousins treated her different because she valued education and they did not, she valued “proper English”, but they did not. I cringed in my seat.  “Ever think,” I wanted to say, “that you stand out among your family because y’all live in the South Bronx but you sound and act like a stereotypical Upper East Side JAP?”

I remember this incident though, because of the girl’s mother.  She’d sought me out after the panel, perhaps because I was the only other black person there and was a few years older than her daughter.  She was West Indian, like me, and spoke with a 24/7 Caribbean accent like my mum.  So I code-switched and inflected my speech with a little Caribbean dialect, too.  The woman’s eyes lit up and she said,  “Come meet my daughter!”

Her daughter was less than thrilled.  She didn’t need a mentor, which is what her mother was trying to force upon both of us in the parking lot of the school’s campus.  The meeting ended awkwardly.  I tried to get the mother to smile.  Her daughter’s first-class education–the thing for which she had undoubtedly sacrificed–formed the chasm that now separated them.  I understood that from my own life.  But how difficult it must have been for the mother to at once, feel pride to watch her daughter speaking on a panel but then, listen to her child denigrate their family in front of strangers.  Talk about an Imitation of Life moment.

McWhorter’s bully and my private school example represent two sides of the same coin.  They speak from the same bleak landscape of low self worth in that they both equate “being educated” with the race to which they do not belong*.  Now, why doesn’t McWhorter make that point?

* I write this, recognizing that race is socially, not biologically, real.

Inauguration Win: In My Own Words…

December 18th, 2008 by

By Maya Pope-Chappell

Photo Taken by Unknown

Photo Taken by Unknown

When I found out that I won inauguration tickets last week I thought it was a scam.  The email came through my phone announcing that I won the inauguration “lottery” through Sen. Charles Schumer. I suppressed my excitement until I was able to verify the win by calling up the senator’s office.
The lottery was real!

Nearly 150,000 New Yorkers entered the lottery to win tickets to the 56th Presidential Inauguration, but only 175 were chosen from New York State.  Nationally, there are about 240,000 available tickets for the swearing-in ceremony of President elect, Barack Obama.

While the fact that I won the tickets is still a bit surreal for me, I always sort of had this feeling that something would happen.  It’s hard to describe, but it’s that feeling you get when inside, you know things will just work in your favor.  And thank God it did!

This means so much; not only to me, but to my family, friends, and especially the people that paved the way for people like Barack Obama; names like Martin Luther King, Shirley Chisholm and the thousands of nameless people who were instrumental in breaking down the barriers of racial inequality.

That is why I accept this ticket humbly.  Because I know that like Obama, I would not have been afforded the opportunities that I have had without the tireless work of those that came before me.  It is because of their persistence, resilience, and dedication to the struggle that I am able to share this pivotal moment in history with millions.

It is for those that have lived to see this day come…

Living to See the Day
By Kristen Joy Watts, Collin Orcutt and Michael Paul Preston

Intersections of Identity

December 8th, 2008 by Alex Green IV

Here is my latest blog post.

11/04/08

November 14th, 2008 by Nicholas Loomis

Now that I’ve overcome the lack of timeliness with this post by luring you in with that dramatic title that will probably be used by Oliver Stone in his next installment of the presidential docudrama series, please play the following clip.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

That was the scene at Solomon’s Porch in the Bedford Stuyvesant neighborhood of Brooklyn when MSNBC pronounced Barack Obama the projected President-Elect of the United States on Election Day night.

To be in New York City that night was a blessing for me. Not because I’m some Obamaniac and I could carouse with my liberal brethren, but because I got to witness the spectacle that was New York City on the night of Nov. 4, 2008.

Well… Brooklyn actually. I didn’t get to Manhattan.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

</p>

Baba Baro celebrates Obama's win in his neighborhood of Bed-Stuy in Brooklyn on Election Day night.

I really only ran into Obama supporters, so I don’t know what McCain backers were doing that night. If I was a McCain supporter, instead of the totally non-partisan, non-biased, non-feeling pressbot that I am, I would at least come out to witness people going absolutely crazy in a totally non-violent way (with the possible exception of Williamsburg, but those kids don’t count). It was history in the making and we were all there, regardless of who we voted for. When reflecting on the events of November 9, 1989, even the highest ranking GDR official has to say to himself, “zat vas pretty cool.”

Not that I’m comparing McCain supporters to Stalinist fascists, but it’s a convenient analogy because, like then in Berlin, a barrier fell in America almost 19 years later.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

</p>Manuel Williams of Canarsie, Brooklyn celebrates at Solomon's Porch in Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn as President-elect Barack Obama takes the stage in Chicago for his victory speech on Tuesday night, Nov. 4, 2008.

Manuel Williams of Canarsie, Brooklyn celebrates at Solomon's Porch in Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn as President-elect Barack Obama takes the stage in Chicago for his victory speech on Tuesday night, Nov. 4, 2008.

With most significant historical events, I believe that it is the reaction to the event, rather than the event itself, that makes it significant. Obviously, we all knew that Obama is black throughout the election. However, he didn’t present himself as a black candidate any more than McCain presented himself as a white candidate. When race came up, Obama addressed it eloquently and dispassionately, and it was again put on the back burner. At the end, it was two intelligent, qualified candidates running for office and race became somewhat of a non-issue. That is, until Election Night.

I shouldn’t have been, but I was really surprised how much talk there was on the streets and in the media about the First Black President (or the second, if you agree with Toni Morrison, who has recently rescinded her 1998 opinion). It would be redundant to speak further on this when my classmate Sophie Cocke has already put it so well. Besides, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention John McCain on that night.

</p>John McCain makes his concession speech in Arizona on Election night. (UPI Photo/Alexis C. Glenn)

John McCain makes his concession speech in Arizona on Election night. (UPI Photo/Alexis C. Glenn)

I have the feeling that McCain had been working on his concession speech for quite a while because it was absolutely fantastic (even if his supporters in attendance weren’t as gracious). When I heard that speech, I remembered why I was happy to see McCain get the nod from the GOP, because either way there would be change in the White House. But it seems that nod had some preconditions and even the Maverick had to kowtow to the Republican base and its campaign methods. His stance on some key issues notwithstanding, I think McCain is an intelligent and earnest leader, and the character he displayed (and referenced ad nauseum) in Vietnam is as important a credential as his 30+ years in the Senate. It’s unfortunate for him and his supporters that his concession speech was the first glimpse we’ve seen of The Real McCain in a long time because if he’d run his entire campaign with the same grace, he might be President-Elect McCain now.

But, of course, the day was Obama’s.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

</p>Obama greets his supporters in Grant Park in Chicago on Election Night. (VII photo by Ron Haviv)

Obama greets his supporters in Grant Park in Chicago on Election Night. (VII photo by Ron Haviv)

***BLOGGER’S NOTE***

Love it or hate it, Iowa’s first-in-the-nation primary got things going for Obama. Here are a couple of pictures I took in my home town of Davenport for my former paper during the months he (basically) lived in Iowa.

How our Baby Boomer Media Covers Race and the Election

November 6th, 2008 by Carla Murphy

Letter to the Editor, The New York Times November 5th print edition, from Rev. Connell J. Maguire, Riviera Beach, FL: That day has dawned, the day dreamed of by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., when a man is judged by the content of his character rather than by the color of his skin. …”

Of which man does Rev. Maguire speak?

I’m not being cheeky.  In fact, the question exhibits a lack of assumption that I wish more of the media had deployed both last night and throughout the election cycle.  Hopefully, they’ll master those assumptions over the next four years of practice.

Here’s my beef with reporters and editors: If you’re going to cover race, you can… nope, you should also speak to the roughly 85 percent of the country who isn’t black.

On November 4, in addition to camping out in Harlem and at Morehouse, the historically black college, the major networks could’ve planted reporters in predominantly white neighborhoods too.

John McCain, in his eloquent concession speech missed an opportunity to get it right.  The “special significance” and “special pride that must be theirs tonight” belongs not just to black Americans.  It is America’s and also belongs to white Americans.

What about the white Freedom Riders who’ve lived to see this election?  There’s also the little white boy or girl in the 1950s, forced to give up a black friend and conform or risk being ostracized?  Fast forward a bit: what about the whites who hunkered down in white flight neighborhoods like those in Long Island or the Detroit suburbs between the 1960s-1980s?  Or the infamous “white working class” voters in Appalachia territory?

If the coverage is tainted with what I’ll call, “Baby Boomer assumptions,” about race and racism then two main but truth-obscuring ideas flourish: 1) blacks support Obama simply because he’s black, rather than because he’s charismatic and qualified and 2) whites are miraculously, race-less, or worse, when they are race-full, it’s only because they’re racist.

The cost of skewed coverage is that Americans really are taken aback by each other November 4th–which means that we (blacks, whites, Asians, etc.) really don’t know each other.  And that the media hasn’t helped us in that regard.  It typically hasn’t covered stories, like this Christian Science Monitor piece, that show us how the country and our relations with each other have changed.

Back to Rev. Maguire’s Letter to the Editor: Suppose Martin Luther King, Jr. in this statement plucked from his 1963 March on Washington speech, also included white men and women?  Suppose he realized that whites also judged each other by the color of their skins rather than the content of their characters?

Perhaps voters, including those who abstained from the process on election day, were finally judging McCain by his character?

Just a thought.  But in the final analysis, it’s the questioning of long-held assumptions that matters more.

Colin Powell, Ben Affleck, Campbell Brown Reject Use of Arab/Muslim as Slur

October 19th, 2008 by Rima Abdelkader

Colin Powell, Ben Affleck, Campbell Brown Reject Use of Arab/Muslim as Slur

By Rima Abdelkader

 

Former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell demonstrated on Sunday that he too can be a maverick.  The moderate Republican not only endorsed Democrat Barack Obama for president, but also expressed his dismay with what he called an unwarranted connection with “some kind of terrorist feelings” and the Illinois senator by John McCain’s campaign.  He, like CNN’s Campbell Brown and Hollywood actor Ben Affleck recently, set the record straight about Obama’s background.  He is not an Arab nor a Muslim, but so what if he was?

 

“Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country?” Powell rhetorically asked on Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press (see minute 4:28).  “The answer’s no, that’s not America.” 

 

Hollywood actor Ben Affleck expressed a similar sentiment on Real Time with Bill Maher on Friday (see minute 5:16). 

 

Affleck referred back to McCain’s response to a woman at one of his rallies who said she did not trust his opponent because he was allegedly an Arab.  He’s a decent family man that I happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues,” McCain told her.

 

“What if somebody said to you, “I heard that he was a Jew?” and I said, “No, he is not a Jew, he’s alright?”” Affleck asked Maher’s audience, which laughed after quickly catching on to his demonstrated absurdity of the question.  Affleck gave another example using Catholic.

 

“Arab and good person are not antithetical to one another,” Affleck emphasized, drawing applause.

 

“This prejudice that we have allowed to fester in this campaign, where we have allowed this idea—denying the fact that Obama who yes is not an Arab nor is he a Muslim—but, we have allowed that to turn into the acceptance of both of those things as a legitimate slur is really a problem,” he told Maher, “These are not slurs.  They are categories of human being.  They are not slurs of people and no one in the media stood up and said that.”

 

But, CNN’s Campbell Brown did so this past week on 13 October on her show.  While commending McCain for correcting his supporter, Brown rhetorically asked, “So what if he was?”

 

“We can’t tolerate this ignorance, not in the media, not on the campaign trail.  Of course he’s not an Arab.  Of course he’s not a Muslim, but, honestly, it shouldn’t matter,” Campbell told her viewers.

 

Powell agreed before giving a poignant story of a Muslim American from New Jersey who gave up his life to serve in Iraq for America:

 

“I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine.  It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.  And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son’s grave.  And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone.  And it gave his awards–Purple Heart, Bronze Star–showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death.  He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn’t have a Christian cross, it didn’t have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith.  And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American.”

 

Many American citizens, including Arab Americans and Muslim Americans, I spoke to were relieved to hear these public figures reject the use of one’s religion or background as a slur, but some were displeased with the timing of the repudiation with the election just two weeks away.

 

What do you think?  Should there have been repudiation from the start?  If so, why?  If not, why not?

Experiment: Live-Blogging the Final Prez Debate

October 15th, 2008 by Carla Murphy

I live-blogged from 9:04 MCT (that’s my computer time) till 10:32 MCT.  Highlights are here; full commentary on my personal blog, SeeMurphy.  Final comments are about Michelle Obama in that hip-hugging dress.  I’m still making up my mind about writing like this… it’s fun for me.  But, is it fun or helpful for you, the reader? [UPDATE: Joe the plumber is real. But he's not a licensed plumber. And his name isn't Joe.]

9:04: McCain, Americans are innocent victims of Wall Street greed.  Really? It’s never helpful, if you’re a grown-up, for others to absolve you when even you know you’ve been wrong.

9:08: McCain’s looking into the camera after asking Obama a question about increasing Joe the Plumber’s taxes.  I don’t really want the candidate to tell me what they’re gonna do for me.  I want them to talk to each other.

9:11: Is Joe the plumber a real person? Hi Joe.  Betcha wish you had a name like Barack now, huh.

9:13: Ask McCain how we’re going to pay off the trillion dollar national debt if we don’t raise taxes?

9:14: “Living beyond our means”–that’s 2008’s most memorable phrase

9:15: Schieffer means business.  Just cut in on Obama not answering fast enough on which programs he’ll cut.

9:19: Obama sounds like he actually reads the reports that come across his table.  Earmarks account for 1/2 of 1% of the budget? Or was that 1/2 of .1% of the budget?  Either way, the man reads!

9:20: My roommate just said, “McCain’s getting very sassy.” In response to McCain telling Obama if he wanted to run against G Bush, he should’ve run against him 4 years ago.

9:24: McCain’s environmental record.  One of the “positives” Obama has is that he has no record for me to look back and say, No, you didn’t.  McCain doesn’t have that luxury.

9:25: McCain, stop talking about the doggone town hall debates… “we could’ve done 10 of ‘em by now.”  Jeez, you sound like a stood up date.

9:29: This is a vigorous debate? Obama, get outta here with that.

9:30: OK McCain, stop with the Obama spending more money on negative ads.  He’s got more money to spend.  It’s the percentages that count.

9:31: Oooh, wow, “When my name was mentioned… people saying stuff like “Terrorist” and “Kill me.” That’s Obama talking! Schieffer: ask Obama what it’s like to hear this?  What it’s been like for how he explains it to his daughters?

9:38: “Those are the people, Dems and Repubs who have shaped my ideas…” — Obama

9:39: McCain, let it go.  What can you win with the Ayers and ACORN link?

9:41: See this week’s New Yorker interview on how Biden came to accept the VP offer.

9:45: McCain, “We’re seeing Iraqis uniting as Iraqis…” — Huh?

9:46: Obama comes across like he’s thinking on the spot and processing information in place.  McCain comes across like he’s giving talking points.

9:47: McCain, Where’re you planning to build those 45 nuclear plants?

9:48: This debate is setting up some measurements for success in 2012.  How much has the country reduced its dependence on foreign oil? is one.

9:53: I’m checking out TNC’s live-blogging too

9:53: I’m drifting.  I heard “Peruvian” and now I’m listening at “automakers.”

9:55: Obama’s cracking up at McCain’s “sitting down without preconditions” line.  Like, full mouthed toothy grin.  Hilarious.

10:00: McCain, We’re back to Joe again!  Dang, what about Latisha? And Hakim?  Mike!

10:00: Obama, “I’m happy to talk to you too Joe if you’re out there.” LOL.  Obama’s not a disser. He’s a smart-ass.

10:03: Now McCain’s talking to Joe.  Joe’s a star!  Go Joe!  First of all, how many Joe’s are there out there?  That ‘Joe’ tactic works if that type’s in the overwhelming majority but what happens if he’s not.  McCain and Obama, by going along with McCain’s thread, are leaving out a lot of people.

10:12: God, I’ve heard enough about the abortion stuff.  If we’re talking about Supreme Court, a question for McCain would be, how can you in good conscience appoint someone who disagrees with the beliefs of most American women?  For Obama, how can you be feel comfortable nominating liberal justices when most of the country is likely moderate or conservative?

10:17: I also like Ambinder’s live-blogging

10:18: Dude, I stopped listening 5 minutes ago.

10:18: McCain, since when do the worse performing schools get the most money?  For New Yorkers, Brownsville gets more money per student than Westchester?  I agree that throwing money at the problem isn’t the only answer but this annoyed me.

10:26: McCain’s sarcasm is unattractive.  Did I say that because I’m a woman? I bet there’s gonna be a poll asking that question and giving a gender breakdown of the responses.

10:30: “Go vote now, it’ll make you feel big and strong.” Schieffer.

10:32: Before I sign off, Dahhhhhh-mmmmmm, Michelle in that dress.  And I’m straight!

END PLAY

What if Barack Hussein Obama Loses?

October 12th, 2008 by Carla Murphy

In the last week, journalists and opinionators have been talking up some variant of the question: How will blacks react if Barack Obama loses?  My response: Does it matter?

Supporters listen to Obama at a town-hall event in McKeesport, Pa. ( Matthew Cavanaugh/EPA-Corbis)

Supporters listen to Obama at a town-hall event in McKeesport, Pa. ( Matthew Cavanaugh/EPA-Corbis)

Our economy is in fetal position.  In two presidential debates–the shining examples of transparency and access that they were–both candidates avoided the word, sacrifice, like its very utterance would pox the American consumer.  The word doesn’t jive with our other national pasttime but folks in Indiana, for example, have been sacrificing for a minute now.

Compared to Indiana Joe Sixpack, at least the New York Times’ Everyman still has the normalcy of his genteel fears.  Really, when are the genteel not scared of something?  Millions of Americans have been complaining for years, of: losing their one car; making the false choice between health care for themselves or their children; declining wages; a disappearing job market, much less a disappearing job; affording college.  With the nation in triage, the NYT’s Everyman worry seems quaint by comparison.

And so does, at least as reported by Newsweek, TIME, and the Washington Post and discussed in the black blogosphere, a racialized preoccupation with an Obama loss.  This isn’t the 1960s.  While race is a factor, it’s not the underlying tension feeding the nation’s partisan rancor.  I’d venture that the only color that rational voters care about these days, is, green–especially as it relates to health care, jobs and Iraq and Afghanistan.

Instead, recent media coverage of the “What if” question favors the more romantic narrative arc of “the children of slaves,” “firehoses and police dogs” and “rising hopes, finally.”  Cue the cliffhanging score by Spike Lee’s favorite composer Terence Blanchard, please.  Will rioting follow? Will whites be proven as racists after all?  Will blacks fall en masse into a depressive swoon never to recover again?  I can’t help but feel like a desire for drama is partially influencing how media is framing a Barack Obama loss.

And I get it.  Great story.  Great story.  But is the made-for-TV-movie “children of slaves” narrative obscuring more than it reveals?  Real life, certainly, isn’t that simple.  More than that though, based on the issues driving this election cycle and historical moment, why does black reaction to an Obama loss matter?

What are other ways for journalists to cover the “What if Obama loses?” question?

Is the “children of slaves” angle the only way to cover race while answering that question?

Obama, McCain: the Burr-Hamilton duel?

October 11th, 2008 by Rima Abdelkader

YouTube Preview Image

Obama, McCain: the Burr-Hamilton duel?

By Rima Abdelkader

 

This one, that one or the other ones.  November fourth is about three weeks away before U.S. voters get to choose someone.  We’ve already had two presidential debates and one veep presidential debate with many polls, including CNN, NBC, FOX, and the Reuters/C-Span/Zogby presidential tracking poll, showing Obama as the winner in the second presidential debate.  But, we won’t know until that day. 

 

What we do know is that the attack ads are in full swing.  McCain is focusing on the danger of Obama’s policies from taxes to funding of troops while Obama is attacking McCain’s healthcare plan.

 

The Campaign Media Analysis Group reported that Obama has already spent $21.5 million on ads nationwide while McCain has spent $9.2 million.  The Group’s representative reportedly said that McCain has no choice but to be negative given his performance in the polls.

 

Senator John McCain has already called Obama’s policies “dangerous” six times, counting both the first and second presidential elections.  This led me to think of the duel between Aaron Burr, the third vice president under Thomas Jefferson, and his rival Alexander Hamilton after Hamilton accused him of being “dangerous.”

 

First Presidential Debate – Friday 26 September 2008

McCain said, “Admiral Mullen suggests that Senator Obama’s plan is dangerous for America.”  Obama responded that Admiral Mullen said that the “withdrawal would be dangerous.”

 

McCain later said, “What Senator Obama doesn’t seem to understand that if without precondition you sit down across the table from someone who has called Israel a “stinking corpse,” and wants to destroy that country and wipe it off the map, you legitimize those comments.  This is dangerous.  It isn’t just naive; it’s dangerous.” 

 

McCain then said, “And we ought to go back to a little bit of Ronald Reagan’s “trust, but verify,” and certainly not sit down across the table from – without precondition, as Senator Obama said he did twice, I mean, it’s just dangerous.”  Obama, in response, said that McCain mischaracterized his opinion.

 

Second Presidential Debate – Tuesday 7 October 2008

McCain said, “If we had done what Sen. Obama wanted done in Iraq, and that was set a date for withdrawal, which Gen. [David] Petraeus, our chief – chairman of our Joint Chiefs of Staff said would be a very dangerous course to take for America, then we would have had a wider war, we would have been back, Iranian influence would have increased, al Qaeda would have re-established a base.”

 

Obama mentioned dangerous once when NBC’s Brokaw asked Obama if Russia was an evil empire under Vladimir Putin.

 

The Campaign Media Analysis Group representative Evan Tracey told CNN that “McCain is almost all negative because he needs to be” and that he is “behind in the polls and outgunned.”

 

McCain came out with an attack ad this past week calling Obama and his policies – you guessed it – dangerous.  I guess we’ll have to wait and see on November fourth who will truly be outgunned – in the polls.

 

What do you think?  Whose policies are more “dangerous”?  

 

 

The Doll Test for Grown Ups

September 22nd, 2008 by Carla Murphy
1940s, Researcher Kenneth Clark looks on as boy chooses white over the black doll

1940s, Researcher Kenneth Clark looks on as boy chooses white over the black doll

Last night I learned that I automatically prefer light-skinned over dark-skinned people and that I have a strong automatic preference for European Americans over African Americans. I’m a brown-skinned black woman.  And a Leo.  Of course I (strongly! and automatically!) prefer myself!  This internal argument about my own racial prejudices is what I get for following Atlantic blogger-reporter, Marc Ambinder’s advice. Um.  Yippee?

In this election, simply mentioning “The Bradley Effect” neutralizes polling results that measure racial attitudes and their impact on voting. (CBS News recently looked at The Bradley Effect here but check out this 2006 Ellis Cose article to see how the same questions repeat as though time hasn’t passed).

It’s no surprise then, that media outlets have been foraging for a new way, other than polling, to answer this election’s trillion dollar question–Will Obama lose the race because of his race?–and as Ambinder writes, the AP has found one. Which led me to take the related Implicit Association Test, which “proved” my unconscious association of “good” with white or light-skin.

The theory behind the IATs (you can test yourself on gender, race, politics, etc) is similar to the heartbreaking doll test used in 1954 to help win Brown v. Board of Ed and desegregate public schools.

A 2006 short film, A Girl Like Me, recreates the 1940s study with, again, depressing results.

2006, Filmmaker Kiri Davis recreates the doll test

2006, Filmmaker Kiri Davis recreates the doll test

I write about my IAT now, not because I’m bothered by my results.  (The test may not measure what I believe, so much as what I’ve been taught to believe or, taught to react to).

What interests me is the extent to which Americans are paying attention to this race stuff.  Without a doubt, even with its many conversational lowpoints, this election is the longest–perhaps since the Civil Rights era–that this country has meditated on race.

That’s gotta be a good thing, right?

What do you think?